Public Sentiment Toward AI: Balancing Humans and AI in an Evolving Workplace

AI technology has been both praised and criticized for its ability to make people’s lives easier. In the workplace, AI is helping to automate repetitive tasks, such as data entry scheduling, and inventory management. Due to its incredible ability to process vast amounts of data quickly and accurately, it also has the potential to provide business insights, recognize patterns, and create predictive algorithms. Often times, AI is better at processing this information than humans. 

Despite its ability to supplement human input, many are also wary of AI, primarily fearing that it could replace human jobs. Especially within creative fields, many worry that AI will displace jobs. During last year’s writer’s and actor’s strike, the use of AI in Hollywood was of utmost concern. Since AI can assist in generating ideas, simplifying editing processes, and even content generation, many speculate about its ability to replace post-production jobs. 

Across industries, it’s imperative to use AI effectively in tandem with humans. This is especially important not only when it comes to preserving jobs, but also because of AI’s current limitations and consumer’s present hesitancy about AI-driven solutions. 

Consumer Reactions to AI

Consumers currently have split opinions about AI use. When it comes to customer service, consumers largely prefer human interaction to AI and are often frustrated when assisted by an automated chatbot. 

People also cited AI’s lack of ability to explain its own answer as a major concern. People want to know why AI got its answer and don’t feel it has sufficient power to explain itself. 

In addition to situational preferences for human interaction, AI has the tendency to hallucinate, meaning that it might simply make things up when it doesn’t know the answer. This means that AI needs to be given proper constraints and needs to be well-prompted. And, when hallucinations do happen, it requires human oversight to correct misinformation.

There is also the issue of AI’s moral decision-making abilities. Though an algorithm may be able to tell you what the statistically correct answer is, it isn’t capable of making moral judgment calls in the same ways humans are. In fields such as medicine, where AI might be tasked with giving medical diagnoses or treatment recommendations, it would lack the ability to navigate ethical dilemmas and quality of life assessments in the same way humans could.  

Despite these commonly cited concerns, others prefer AI’s computing power to human error, believing it to be more accurate, and more teachable than humans.  

Leveraging AI Effectively

The power of AI should not be overlooked, but it should also be kept in check. Research found that in advertising product descriptions and persuasive content for ad campaigns, readers preferred AI-written or AI-edited product descriptions to those written by humans. When readers were told that AI was employed, they did not rate the writing any lower. While persuasion has long been considered a human skill, research indicates that AI might actually be more persuasive than humans.  

AI has the potential to automate many repetitive tasks, streamlining human workflow and allowing them to focus efforts on tasks that require human oversight. Particularly in creative industries, AI can be harnessed to make the editing process more seamless. But it's hard to imagine a future where AI can automate creative direction, for example. When integrating AI into the workplace, it’s important to consider, therefore, not only consumer’s preferences, but also the capabilities and limitations of AI algorithms. 

Stay up to date on our latest posts by subscribing to our newsletter and following us on LinkedIn and Instagram.

‍